top of page
  • Writer's pictureAllan Major

A Nightmare On Elm Street 2 Freddy's Revenge 1985 Reviewed

Featured Image For A Nightmare On Elm Street 2 Freddy's Revenge 1985 Reviewed.  Movie poster for A Nightmare on Elm Street 2: Freddy's Revenge featuring Freddy Krueger and a terrified couple.
In 'A Nightmare on Elm Street 2: Freddy's Revenge,' Freddy Krueger's malevolent spirit returns, seeking to possess a new victim and spread his reign of terror.

In the hazy realm where dreams blend into nightmares, “A Nightmare on Elm Street 2: Freddy's Revenge” occupies a unique and often contentious place. The 1985 sequel to Wes Craven's original masterpiece brings us back to Springwood, a place forever haunted by the disfigured and malevolent Freddy Krueger. As the moonlight filters through the sycamores of Elm Street, the echoes of children's rhymes—one, two, Freddy's coming for you—begin anew. Yet, this iteration dives deeper, infusing the series with a different flavor of horror, one that festers beneath the surface of adolescence and identity. It’s a film that invites not just to be watched, but to be dissected, revealing layers that are both unnerving and thought-provoking.

Key Takeaways From This Film

  • Unique Take on Freddy Krueger: Unlike the first film, Freddy Krueger operates more freely in the real world, breaking the established rules of the dream realm and bringing terror directly into the physical world.

  • Jesse Walsh’s Internal Struggle: The protagonist, Jesse Walsh, experiences both external terror from Freddy and internal turmoil regarding his identity, making his character arc a focal point of the film.

  • Psychological and Physical Horror: The film intertwines psychological horror with physical manifestations, such as Freddy bursting from Jesse’s body, enhancing the visceral impact.

  • Subtext of Homosexuality: The film suggests an undertone of homosexuality, particularly in Jesse’s interactions and his struggle with identity, adding a layer of complexity and social commentary.

  • Departure from Wes Craven's Vision: Directed by Jack Sholder, the film deviates from Wes Craven's original vision, offering a different stylistic and narrative approach that has been both criticized and praised.

Woman afraid while watching A Nightmare On Elm Street 2: Freddy's Revenge (1985).
Freddy's revenge sends chills down her spine, each scream piercing the dark silence.

In “A Nightmare on Elm Street 2: Freddy's Revenge,” we follow Jesse Walsh, a teenage boy who has moved into Nancy Thompson's former home with his family. The house, still shadowed by the events of the first film, becomes a vessel for Freddy Krueger’s dark intentions. Unlike the traditional slasher film formula, this sequel stands out by its subtext and its bold, albeit divisive, exploration of teenage fear and confusion. Mark Patton, in his role as Jesse, delivers a performance that teeters between terror and turmoil, embodying a character who is both haunted by Freddy and grappling with his own identity.

The film opens with a scene on a school bus—a prelude to terror. As the bus veers off the road and into a surreal landscape, the boundaries between reality and nightmare blur, setting the tone for the rest of the film. This opening is a perfect microcosm of the nightmare realm that Freddy commands, where the laws of physics are bent to his will, and terror is omnipresent.

Robert Englund reprises his role as Freddy Krueger, once again donning the infamous glove on his hand, his presence as chilling as ever. Freddy’s revenge in this film is not just about physical torment but psychological invasion. His grip on Jesse is both literal and metaphorical, pushing Jesse to the brink as he struggles to maintain control over his own body. The infamous scene where Freddy bursts from Jesse’s body is a grotesque spectacle, a forced-birth technique reminiscent of the alien films, showcasing the film’s penchant for visceral horror.

Director Jack Sholder brings a different vision to the franchise, one that diverges from Wes Craven's original. Sholder’s approach, combined with David Chaskin’s screenplay, infuses the film with a palpable sense of dread and an undercurrent of sexuality. The film suggested an undertone of homosexuality, which has been a subject of much debate and analysis. This subtext, whether intentional or not, adds a layer of complexity to the narrative, making Jesse's journey a metaphor for the struggles of a sexually confused kid in a society that is anything but accepting.

The dynamics between Jesse and his friend Grady, played by Robert Rusler, and his burgeoning relationship with Lisa, portrayed by Kim Myers, further complicate his already tumultuous life. The pool party scene, where Freddy manifests and wreaks havoc, is emblematic of the chaos that Jesse feels within. The horror spills from the dream realm into reality, blurring the lines and heightening the film’s tension.

Man afraid while watching A Nightmare On Elm Street 2: Freddy's Revenge (1985).
As Freddy's revenge unfolds, his fear is almost tangible, every scene a step closer to madness.

Our Nightmares Became Deadly Again

One of the film's most controversial elements is its departure from the rules established in the first nightmare. In “A Nightmare on Elm Street 2,” Freddy operates in the real world more freely, a choice that has led to both criticism and praise. This narrative decision creates a film that feels like a different beast compared to its predecessor, challenging the expectations set by the original.

The soundtrack by Christopher Young underscores the film’s eerie atmosphere, enhancing the sense of unease that permeates every frame. The score, coupled with the cinematography, creates a nightmarish tableau that lingers long after the credits roll. Freddy’s presence is felt in every shadow, every flicker of light, a testament to Englund’s enduring portrayal of the character.

The film’s conclusion, where Jesse seemingly overcomes Freddy, is both a resolution and a harbinger of future nightmares. The final scene leaves the door ajar for Freddy’s inevitable return, a promise fulfilled in the subsequent sequels, including “A Nightmare on Elm Street 3: Dream Warriors.” The legacy of Elm Street endures, each film adding to the mythos of Freddy Krueger, the boogeyman who transcends the bounds of the screen.

Reflecting on “A Nightmare on Elm Street 2: Freddy's Revenge,” it is clear that the film occupies a singular place in the franchise. It is a film that dared to deviate from the expected, to explore themes and ideas that were ahead of its time. While it may not have been universally loved upon its release, its impact and the conversations it sparked are undeniable. The film is a testament to the enduring power of horror to not only frighten but to provoke thought and discussion.

In the end, “A Nightmare on Elm Street 2: Freddy's Revenge” is more than just a sequel; it is a film that delves into the labyrinth of the human psyche, exposing the fears and desires that lie within. As the screen fades to black and the echoes of Freddy’s laughter linger, one cannot help but be drawn back into the nightmare, eager to explore its dark corridors once more.

And that is A Nightmare On Elm Street 2 Freddy's Revenge 1985 Reviewed. Another classic horror movie in the Freddy Franchise. 

Stay tuned for more horror movie reviews

If You Liked A Nightmare On Elm Street 2 Freddy's Revenge You Might Also Like These Films

"Hellraiser" (1987)

Directed by Clive Barker, "Hellraiser" is a dark and twisted tale of pain and pleasure, where a man named Frank Cotton opens a puzzle box and unleashes the Cenobites—demonic beings who offer an eternity of torture. The film explores themes of desire, sadomasochism, and the consequences of seeking forbidden pleasures.

"Fright Night" (1985)

Directed by Tom Holland, "Fright Night" follows teenager Charley Brewster, who discovers that his new neighbor, Jerry Dandrige, is a vampire. As Charley struggles to convince others of the threat, he enlists the help of a washed-up TV vampire hunter. The film blends horror and humor, offering a nostalgic and chilling experience.

"The Lost Boys" (1987)

Directed by Joel Schumacher, "The Lost Boys" is a stylish vampire film set in the coastal town of Santa Carla. Teenager Michael Emerson moves to the town with his family and soon finds himself entangled with a gang of young vampires. The film combines horror, rock 'n' roll, and coming-of-age themes, making it a cult classic.

"The Evil Dead" (1981)

Directed by Sam Raimi, "The Evil Dead" follows a group of friends who travel to a remote cabin and unwittingly unleash demonic forces after discovering the Necronomicon, a book of the dead. The film is known for its intense gore, innovative camera work, and relentless horror, establishing itself as a landmark in the genre.

"Poltergeist" (1982)

Directed by Tobe Hooper and produced by Steven Spielberg, "Poltergeist" tells the story of the Freeling family, whose suburban home becomes haunted by malevolent spirits. When their young daughter, Carol Anne, is abducted by the entities, the family seeks the help of paranormal investigators to rescue her. The film is renowned for its special effects and supernatural thrills.

A Nightmare On Elm Street 2 Freddy's Revenge 1985 Reviewed FAQs

Q: What is A Nightmare On Elm Street 2 Freddy's Revenge?

A: "A Nightmare On Elm Street 2: Freddy's Revenge" is the second film in the Nightmare on Elm Street franchise, released in 1985. It follows the story of Jesse Walsh, a teenager who moves into Nancy Thompson's former house and becomes the target of Freddy Krueger's terror.

Q: Who directed A Nightmare On Elm Street 2 Freddy's Revenge?

A: "A Nightmare On Elm Street 2: Freddy's Revenge" was directed by Jack Sholder. Sholder is known for his work in the horror genre, having also directed "Alone in the Dark" (1982) and "The Hidden" (1987).

Q: Is A Nightmare On Elm Street 2 Freddy's Revenge a horror film?

A: Yes, "A Nightmare On Elm Street 2: Freddy's Revenge" is a horror film that continues the Elm Street legacy, focusing on supernatural and psychological horror elements as Freddy Krueger invades the dreams and reality of the protagonist, Jesse Walsh.

Q: What is the plot of A Nightmare On Elm Street 2 Freddy's Revenge?

A: The plot of "A Nightmare On Elm Street 2: Freddy's Revenge" revolves around Jesse Walsh, a teenage boy who moves with his family into Nancy Thompson's former home. Jesse is haunted by Freddy Krueger, who attempts to possess his body to carry out his reign of terror in the real world. The film explores Jesse's struggle with Freddy's influence and his fight to regain control.

Q: Why do some fans hate A Nightmare On Elm Street 2 Freddy's Revenge?

A: Some fans dislike "A Nightmare On Elm Street 2: Freddy's Revenge" because it deviates from the original film's dream-based horror, allowing Freddy to operate more freely in the real world. Additionally, the film's tone and the inclusion of a subtext of homosexuality have been polarizing among viewers, leading to mixed reactions.

Q: What is the significance of the S&M bar scene in A Nightmare On Elm Street 2 Freddy's Revenge?

A: The S&M bar scene is significant because it underscores the film's controversial subtext and contributes to its unique identity within the franchise. The scene, where Jesse encounters his gym coach, Coach Schneider, played by Marshall Bell, in a leather bar, adds to the themes of sexual confusion and repression that are explored throughout the film.

Q: Who are the key characters in A Nightmare On Elm Street 2 Freddy's Revenge?

A: The key characters in "A Nightmare On Elm Street 2: Freddy's Revenge" include Jesse Walsh, played by Mark Patton; Freddy Krueger, portrayed by Robert Englund; Lisa Webber, Jesse's love interest, played by Kim Myers; and Ron Grady, Jesse's friend, played by Robert Rusler. Other notable characters include Coach Schneider and Jesse's parents, Ken and Cheryl Walsh, played by Clu Gulager and Hope Lange, respectively.

Q: How does A Nightmare On Elm Street 2 Freddy's Revenge differ from the first film?

A: "A Nightmare On Elm Street 2: Freddy's Revenge" differs from the first film in several ways. The primary difference is the shift from a dream-centric horror to a narrative where Freddy Krueger exerts influence in the real world. The film also introduces a controversial subtext of homosexuality, which was not present in the original. Additionally, the character dynamics and development focus more on Jesse's internal struggle with Freddy's possession rather than the group of teenagers battling a common threat as in the first film.


bottom of page